帝国主义

帝国主义是资本主义的最高阶段，垄断与企业操控政府普遍存在于帝国主义的经济体制中。

在弗拉基米尔·列宁对帝国主义的理论中，认为帝国主义由五个基本特征定义： 存在在经济生活中有决定性作用的垄断; 银行资本与工业资本合并为金融寡头控制的金融资本; 资本的输出而不是简单的商品输出; 国际垄断组织形成以及整个世界被强大的资本主义国家瓜分。这种对马克思对资本主义发展的分析的扩展是列宁对政治经济学最重要的理论贡献之一。

帝国主义在全球经济中的发展，也增强了与周边国家之间的联系，主要表现为欠发达国家对帝国主义国家的依附和从属。

理论基础

马克思根据他的运动规律理论得出结论，随着资本主义的发展，它们将不可避免地陷入危机，从而导致内部无产阶级起义，建立无产阶级专政（最终是社会主义）。然而，根据列宁的观察，帝国主义阶段使资本主义能够通过掠夺殖民地来缓解这场危机，殖民地是资本输出的新渠道和新的劳动力来源。

这种资本主义帝国的疯狂扩张迫使各个帝国主义列强开始争夺势力范围、资源和劳动力市场，这导致了破坏性的帝国主义列强内部冲突，如第一次世界大战。因此，帝国主义将资本主义的内在矛盾扩大到了更极端的程度，故此斯大林认为列宁主义是“帝国主义时代的马克思主义”。

帝国主义作为资本主义的一个发展阶段，意味着它将永远以任何足够发达的资本主义生产方式发展。随着市场在一些国家内部饱和，资本必须输出到其他地方，银行的主要功能是帮助实现这一点（参见金融资本主义）。

各国必定会走向帝国主义，原因如下：

1. 资本主义需要不断的消费，转化为持续的增长（GDP的增长）。没有GDP增长，资本主义就会停滞不前，经济衰退就会发生。但是，由于不可能在有限的可用资源下实现无限增长，随着市场趋于饱和，资产阶级必须寻求新的市场。
2. 资产阶级也处于不断的内部竞争之中，因此，资本家欲在竞争中取得胜利就需要扩展新的市场和寻求更便宜的劳动力将使他们在竞争中占据优势。

但是，被帝国主义剥削的国家是无法发展到超过资本主义最原始的阶段的，更无法发展到帝国主义阶段。在这些国家，资产阶级有两个不同分支的出现。首先，“买办”阶级，即民族资产阶级中与外国帝国主义投资者结盟并依赖外国帝国主义的一部分。另一部分是“民族”资产阶级，他们的阶级利益暂时与被剥削的本国工人阶级结盟，以实现民族解放（这样他们就可以成为剥削者而不受剥削，到那时他们与本国无产阶级的结盟就会破裂）。

恩格斯

弗里德里希·恩格斯在《共产主义原理》中提到了帝国主义：

这样，所有迄今为止对历史发展或多或少是陌生的,工业以制造业为基础半野蛮国家，都被暴力地赶出了孤立状态。他们购买英国人更便宜的商品，并允许他们自己的制造业被毁掉。几千年来一直没有进步的国家——例如印度——被彻底革命化了，甚至中国现在也正在走向革命的道路上。

我们已经到了这样的地步：英国发明的一台新机器在一年内剥夺了数百万中国工人的生计。

通过这种方式，大工业使地球上所有的人相互接触，将所有市场合并为一个世界市场，在各地传播文明和进步，从而确保了文明国家发生的任何事情都会对所有其他国家产生影响。

— 恩格斯, 《共产主义原理》

在这本书创作的时候，帝国主义还不是一个常用的词。然而，帝国主义的政策已经在世界各地实行了，特别是在非洲的大英帝国殖民地中。

Given that imperialism is, (according to Lenin) the highest stage of capitalism, one tendency of imperialism is to export the class conflict of a nation to foreign lands. Thus, the British nation, in order to solve its problem of unemployment and food scarcity along a capitalist basis (without socialism; redistribution of wealth and power to the commoners through social ownership) it had to find new lands to settle the unemployed.

"In order to save the forty million inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a bloody civil war, our colonial statesmen must acquire new lands for settling the surplus population of this country, to provide new markets. ... The Empire, as I have always said, is a bread and butter question."

— Cecil Rhodes, British imperialist, as quoted in Lenin's Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism

Contemporary times

Imperial core

Today, imperialism is still very much alive as Lenin described. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank for example were institutions created for the benefit of the imperial core (the richest and oldest capitalist economies, grossly encompassing North America and Western Europe) so as to perpetually keep former colonised countries in debt that they can not repay. The IMF is known to demand specific free market policies put into place so as to facilitate movement of capital from the imperial core towards these ex-colonies, also known as the Global South. On top of having many strings attached, the IMF is allowed to seize projects when loans cannot be paid back, and they often can't due to very harsh payment plans (usually very high interest rates over a 7-year period).

This "soft" imperialism is not the only form of imperialism happening, and we can look at the US Invasion of Iraq in 2003 for a "harder" form of imperialism. In this case, the entire country of Iraq as well as the surrounding region was destabilized, which allowed U.S. oil companies to eliminate competition and seize these wells for themselves.

Soviet "imperialism"

During the Cold War, a rivalry between the world's two global powers at the time (the USA and the Soviet Union), the CIA's Congress for Cultural Freedom cultivated a milieu of anti-Soviet leftists to advance the geopolitical line of the US. One accusation that was leveled against the Soviet union was that it was yet another imperialist state, based on the conflicts which happened between the Soviet Union and China. USSR did not practice imperialism in the Leninist sense — it did not export capital and was not under control of a financial oligarchy.

Chinese "imperialism"

In modern times, some accuse China of being imperialist, mainly in Africa. These people again use the liberal definition of imperialism and can be ignored in much the same way.

With its Belt and Road Initiative, China does not practice the same harsh policies as the IMF (namely, forcing austerity upon loan recipients) and that is why they are being favored by more and more countries, leading to a disinformation campaign by the imperial core to help drive popular support from the B&R and back towards the IMF. Famously, Chinese loans pay for infrastructure (needed for development), are often forgiven , and there are no policies required to getting such a loan.

Imperialist military

Imperialism is enforced by military power -- especially, since the early 20th century, by U.S. military power. One indication of this is the large number of military bases that the U.S. maintains in foriegn countries and the large number of U.S. troops stationed around the world.

U.S. military personnel in Europe

At the end of 2021, the United States had 74,000 military personnel stationed in Europe in long-term positions (according to the U.S. Congressional Research Service). Not all are combat-ready troops. The numbers of these U.S. personnel in some particular countries is as follows:

• Germany, 36,000
• Italy, 12,000
• Britain, 9,000
• Spain, 3,000
• Turkey, 1,600

Besides these personnel, the U.S. rotates 4,500 troops through Poland.